How might an agent's actions be evaluated in a disciplinary context?

In a disciplinary context, evaluating an agent's actions requires a comprehensive understanding of all violations according to the established regulations and guidelines. An objective analysis of all violations ensures that the evaluation process is fair, impartial, and grounded in the specific rules set forth by FIFA.

This approach allows for a thorough examination of the agent's behavior, including any breaches of ethical standards or professional conduct. By looking at the full scope of the agent's actions, disciplinary committees can place the conduct within the framework of FIFA's expectations and standards. This holistic view facilitates consistent application of the disciplinary code and ensures that all relevant factors are considered before determining any potential consequences.

Other methods, such as customer feedback or peer reviews, may provide some insights into an agent's reputation or performance but are not definitive measures for evaluating compliance with disciplinary rules. Financial outcomes, while significant in certain contexts, do not encompass all aspects of an agent's responsibilities and conduct. Therefore, utilizing an objective analysis of all violations is the most appropriate and effective method for a thorough evaluation in a disciplinary context.