What happens when a conflict of interest arises within the judicial committee?

When a conflict of interest arises within the judicial committee, the correct course of action is for the chairperson to decide on the claim. This approach allows the committee to maintain its functionality while ensuring that the integrity of the judicial process is upheld. Typically, the chairperson may evaluate the specific circumstances of the conflict and determine whether they or any other members have a legitimate interest that could bias their judgment.

By involving the chairperson in this way, the committee can continue its work without necessitating a complete disruption or cancellation of the proceedings. It also provides a mechanism for oversight, as the chairperson is responsible for maintaining impartiality and ensuring that conflicts are addressed appropriately without compromising the entire committee.

In contrast, the other answers suggest more drastic or impractical measures—like completely canceling the process, requiring the entire committee to recuse themselves, or escalating the issue to the FIFA President—which may not be necessary or effective in managing conflicts of interest efficiently.