What type of evidence is admissible in disciplinary hearings according to the FIFA Agent Disciplinary Code?

The FIFA Agent Disciplinary Code allows for a broad range of evidence to be admissible in disciplinary hearings, specifically identifying that documents, testimony, and electronic communications that are deemed relevant and credible can be presented. This inclusive approach ensures that all pertinent information can be assessed, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the case.

Documents can include contracts, correspondence, and any official records that might support or refute the claims made in the disciplinary process. Testimony can come from various sources, providing firsthand accounts that might shed light on the situation in question. Electronic communications such as emails, messages, and other digital correspondence are also valuable as they can offer insight into the intentions and actions of the parties involved.

In this context, the options that limit admissible evidence to a narrow set, such as just verbal testimonies or only video evidence, do not align with the principles established in the FIFA Agent Disciplinary Code. Confidential agreements, while potentially sensitive, are not necessarily relevant to a disciplinary hearing unless they specifically pertain to the matters under investigation. Thus, the correct choice reflects a comprehensive and fair approach to gathering evidence in disciplinary procedures.