Which of the following is true regarding disciplinary procedures for agents?

The statement that prior conduct influences sanction severity is accurate within the context of disciplinary procedures for agents. In many regulatory frameworks, including those governing sports agents, an agent’s previous violations or disciplinary history can significantly impact the severity of the penalties imposed for new infractions. This principle is grounded in the importance of maintaining integrity and adhering to standards set forth by the governing body. A history of past misconduct may lead to harsher sanctions, as it indicates a pattern of behavior that fails to meet the expected ethical and professional standards.

By taking previous violations into account, the disciplinary body aims to promote compliance and deterrence among agents, thereby fostering a fair and equitable environment in sports representation. Such a system emphasizes accountability and encourages agents to conduct themselves in accordance with established rules and regulations, highlighting the ongoing responsibility of agents to uphold the integrity of their position.

In contrast, the other options suggest limitations or considerations that do not align with standard disciplinary practices. For instance, the notion that disciplinary outcomes can only involve fines overlooks the range of potential penalties, including suspensions or revocations of licenses. Disregarding previous violations would undermine the consistency and fairness of the disciplinary process, as would a focus solely on current allegations without consideration of an agent's complete conduct history.